Below, we document the flouting of workers’ compensation law by AmTrust North America (AmTrust), and its continued refusal to reimburse a provider despite being ordered to do so by Maximus. In this latest installment of the IBR Hall of Shame, we chronicle an all-too-familiar payment marathon that starts when a provider “wins” an Independent Bill Review (IBR). This particular case is but one of innumerable examples of claims administrators’ blatant disregard for California law, and their reliance on a state workers’ compensation system that repeatedly fails to protect providers who shoulder the responsibility for treating injured workers.
We often hear employers bemoan the difficulties faced by injured workers in their attempts to obtain treatment for work-related injuries. At a conference we attended last year, employers stated again and again that they are willing to pay top dollar for care for their employees. However, as we repeatedly explained to these employers, their willingness to pay stood in direct contrast to the frequently obstructive behavior of their hired third party administrators and workers’ comp insurers, whose priorities seem more geared toward denying payment rather than securing care.
For employers, the kind of provider payment abuse documented below exemplifies the reason many providers refuse to treat injured workers.
AmTrust, acting on behalf of the employer Accuire LLC dba VForce Staffing Solutions, refuses to pay a provider the amounts that were due when the provider prevailed in a recent IBR case. The efforts, documented below, to collect this payment demonstrate, yet again, how the provider must shoulder all the responsibility for collecting payment. Multiple phone conversations and voicemails, careful documentation, and climbing stress levels are par for the course for providers who seek to induce a claims administrator to meet its mandated obligations.
In this instance, Maximus agreed with the provider that they received incorrect reimbursement and accordingly ordered AmTrust to reimburse the provider for both the additional reimbursement due and the $180 IBR fee paid by the provider to file the IBR. According to California regulations, AmTrust must remit said payment to the provider within 45 days of the IBR decision. In this instance payment was due 7/12/2020.
As of 9/15/2020, the IBR Additional Reimbursement and IBR Filing Fee are 65 days past due.
Despite an IBR decision awarding the provider the correct reimbursement, despite numerous voicemails and conversations with AmTrust representatives, AmTrust continues to refuse to properly reimburse the provider for an Original bill electronically submitted on 12/18/2019.
To highlight just the latest of the frustrating conversations, on 9/2/2020 a DaisyCollect representative spoke to the AmTrust adjuster who gave a rationale for the denial that was not only non-compliant but, frankly, jaw-dropping:
DaisyCollect left five voicemails and had four conversations with AmTrust from 7/13/2020 through 9/2/2020.
Claims Administrator: AmTrust North America
Employer: Accuire, LLC DBA Vforce Staffing Solutions
Date |
Days Payment Overdue |
Action |
Action Count |
Notes |
05/28/2020 |
0 |
Maximus issued Overturn decision |
N/A |
Maximus determined additional reimbursement is warranted. |
07/12/2020 |
0 |
Additional Revenue $174.82 & $180 IBR Filing Fee due |
N/A |
Additional revenue plus IBR Filing Fee due 45-Days after Maximus Final Determination Letter. |
07/13/2020 |
1 |
DaisyCollect called AmTrust |
1st conversation |
Obtained adjuster name and contact information. |
07/13/2020 |
1 |
DaisyCollect left voicemail with adjuster |
1st voicemail |
Called RXXXX at XXX-XXX-XXXX and left a voicemail in regards to the missing IBR payments. Asked for a return call. |
07/15/2020 |
3 |
DaisyCollect left voicemail with adjuster |
2nd voicemail |
Left second voicemail with adjuster after no response received. |
07/22/2020 |
10 |
DaisyCollect left voicemail with adjuster |
3rd voicemail |
Left third voicemail with adjuster after no response received. |
07/23/2020 |
11 |
DaisyCollect called AmTrust |
2nd conversation |
Obtained the supervisor’s name and contact information. |
07/23/2020 |
11 |
DaisyCollect left voicemail with adjuster’s supervisor |
4th voicemail |
Called supervisor GXXXX at XXX-XXX-XXXX. There was no answer so I left a voicemail in regards to the payments and asked for a return call. |
07/28/2020 |
16 |
DaisyCollect called adjuster’s supervisor |
3rd conversation |
Supervisor picked up and explained they don't have information about this IBR payment. They took my contact info down and said they will tell the adjustor, RXXXX, to give me a call back. |
08/18/2020 |
37 |
DaisyCollect left voicemail with adjuster’s supervisor |
5th voicemail |
Left second voicemail with adjuster’s supervisor after no response received. |
09/02/2020 |
52 |
DaisyCollect called adjuster |
4th conversation |
Spoke with adjuster RXXXX and they explained that they do not think the provider is on their MPN. According to the adjuster, then AmTrust denies provider’s services and the IBR does not apply. Adjuster needs the determination letter, reports and all billing faxed to them. Adjuster will look into this and give an update by the end of next week. |
09/02/2020 |
52 |
DaisyCollect faxed adjuster |
1 |
DaisyCollect faxed Maximus Final Determination Letter to adjuster. |
09/09/2020 |
59 |
DaisyCollect filed Audit Complaint |
1 |
DaisyCollect filed Audit Complaint for AmTrust’s failure to pay IBR fees despite multiple attempts to collect. |
Despite our continued efforts, our client remains unpaid. And this is just one instance among many, in a practice context where countless providers have barely enough administrative staff to file bills compliantly. Most providers do not have the resources or staff, like we do, to doggedly chase down missed payments. So when the claims administrator ignores their duty to pay up, or actively resists paying, it is the claims administrator that wins and the provider who suffers.
Does Vforce Staffing Solutions know this is how their administrators and workers' comp insurers are managing these workers' comp claims?
If your practice is experiencing similar roadblocks to collecting mandated payment, we recommend filing an Audit Complaint. They are effective and anonymous (as long as you check the right box). For DaisyBillers, we’ve made it incredibly easy to file through DaisyBill; for non-DaisyBillers, watch this short webinar that explains the audit process -- but remember to use the Audit Complaint form that was updated in 2019.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.