Like The Zenith, California’s State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) consistently pays Medicare rates to doctors for treating injured workers.
According to data from over 60,000 e-bills daisyBill doctors sent to SCIF in 2022 for Evaluation and Management (E/M) services, SCIF reimbursed doctors at essentially Medicare rates, which are far below the rates established by California’s Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS).
For E/M services provided to injured workers in 2022, SCIF paid:
To receive these lowball rates for treating an injured worker covered by SCIF, a doctor and their administrative staff must expend extraordinary resources to adhere to onerous (and payer-friendly) California workers’ comp regulatory mandates — none of which are required by Medicare.
In 2022, the Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) set Physician Fee Schedule rates at almost 134% of Medicare rates. This means that if the Medicare reimbursement is $100, the DWC believes the physician was entitled to $134 — an additional $34 to manage the workers’ comp mandates imposed on your practice by California.
By reimbursing at Medicare rates, SCIF is paying doctors $0 to manage these mandates.
Bottom line: It is not financially feasible to treat injured workers for the same reimbursement you receive for treating Medicare patients. See for yourself by completing the simple workers’ comp Profit & Loss calculation exercise below.
Doctors, please do the arithmetic; it’s simple Profit & Loss.
Profit & Loss Calculation - For each of the eleven workers’ comp CA Administrative Requirements listed below:
CA Administrative Requirements:
Every time an injured worker steps into a California practice, the provider must be prepared to assume the costs of navigating the above administrative maze. Even if you assign a cost of $1 to each of the above requirements, this exercise clearly demonstrates that providers are actually earning far less than Medicare reimbursements (trust us, many of the listed items cost your practice more than $1).
Again, Medicare imposes none of the administrative costs listed above. The steps represent eleven reasons that in 2022, California set Physician Fee Schedule reimbursement rates at roughly 134% of Medicare reimbursement rates.
All Primary Treating Physicians (PTPs) use E/M billing codes to report the level of E/M services required to treat an injured worker. Physicians also use these E/M codes when treating Medicare and group health patients.
Unfortunately (for doctors, injured workers, and employers), the data below exposes that California allowed SCIF to reduce new patient E/M reimbursements to 76% of OMFS rates, equaling 102% of Medicare.
In fact, for new patient E/M services in 2022, SCIF paid its lowest reimbursement rate for the two most-reported codes, CPT 99204 and CPT 99205:
E/M New Patient CPT |
Bill Count |
% of Total Bill Count |
Paid E/M Count |
Denied E/M Count |
Denal % |
Paid % of OMFS Rate |
Paid % of Medicare Rate |
99202 |
94 |
1% |
90 |
4 |
4% |
95% |
128% |
99203 |
1,697 |
22% |
1,531 |
137 |
8% |
88% |
118% |
99204 |
2,889 |
37% |
2,654 |
171 |
6% |
75% |
101% |
99205 |
3,026 |
39% |
2,663 |
315 |
10% |
72% |
97% |
Totals |
7,706 |
100% |
6,938 |
627 |
8% |
76% |
102% |
Data from over 53,000 E/M reimbursements reveals SCIF reimbursed established-patient E/M codes at rates below the OMFS, and below Medicare rates. In total, SCIF’s 2022 E/M reimbursement rate for established patients was 74% of OMFS, which equaled 99% of Medicare reimbursement.
For established patient E/M services in 2022, SCIF paid its lowest reimbursements for two frequently reported codes, CPT 99214 and CPT 99215:
E/M Established Patient CPT |
Bill Count |
% of Total Bill Count |
Paid E/M Count |
Denied E/M Count |
Denal % |
Paid % of OMFS Rate |
Paid % of Medicare Rate |
99211 |
147 |
0% |
139 |
6 |
4% |
91% |
122% |
99212 |
1,190 |
2% |
1,098 |
85 |
7% |
86% |
115% |
99213 |
10,710 |
20% |
9,978 |
638 |
6% |
80% |
108% |
99214 |
32,481 |
61% |
29,653 |
2,593 |
8% |
75% |
101% |
99215 |
8,538 |
16% |
8,123 |
355 |
4% |
66% |
88% |
Totals |
53,066 |
100% |
48,991 |
3,677 |
7% |
74% |
99% |
How is SCIF able to pay these amounts for treating injured workers? The same way Zenith does: the Anthem Blue Cross PPO. SCIF demands that providers participate in PPOs, and therefore accept PPO reimbursement discounts, under threat of being excluded from SCIF’s MPN.
It’s another “pay-to-treat” arrangement.
In the email below, SCIF states flatly that refusal to participate in the Anthem PPO means exclusion from the SCIF MPN.
To understand just how unsustainable it is for claims administrators to pay Medicare rates (or below) for treating injured workers, we again present the administrative steps involved in new patient E/M services for workers’ comp.
The above does not include the arduous process of submitting appeals to battle constant improper payment reductions and denials, another source of practice expense. Once again for the cheap seats, this is the reality of workers’ comp in California.
As long as claims administrators are allowed to use the PPO trap to defund doctors, workers’ comp in California will suffer.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.