ML201 / MLPRR - Sedgwick Claims Management Services: Grade F

catherine-69b6e342
ML201 / MLPRR - Sedgwick Claims Management Services: Grade F

Claims administrator failed to properly reimburse ML201 and MLPRR. Sedgwick incorrectly denied valid medical-legal codes as “not in the fee schedule.” Date of Service: 04/06/2021

MLFS Code(s)

ML201 - Comprehensive Medical-Legal Evaluation

MLPRR - Record Review

MLFS Modifier(s)

95 - Evaluation performed by a panel selected Qualified Medical Evaluator

96 - Evaluation performed by a Psychiatrist or Psychologist when a psychiatric or psychological evaluation is the primary focus of the medical-legal evaluation

MLFS Grade

F

Claims Administrator

Sedgwick Claims Management Services

Bill Review Vendor

Conduent

Employer

The Salvation Army

EOR

Adjustment Reason

549 - The service(s) on this claim have been denied because the provider billed using a procedure code that is not in the fee schedule

Second Review Reason to dispute incorrect reimbursement: ML201

Claims administrator incorrectly denied reimbursement. Per CCR §9795, ML201 is valid reimbursable procedure code that includes all comprehensive medical-legal evaluations that do not qualify as follow-up or supplemental medical- legal evaluations. Provider conducted a Comprehensive Medical-Legal Evaluation at the request of the parties. ML201-95-96 payment due: $4,030.00. In addition to payment, penalties and interest are now due.

Second Review Reason to dispute incorrect reimbursement: MLPRR

Claims administrator incorrectly denied reimbursement. Per CCR §9795, MLPRR is a valid reimbursable procedure code used to identify charges for review of records in excess of pages included in medical-legal numerical billing codes. Excess pages are billed at three dollars per page. Provider documented record review page count in report. MLPRR payment due: $1,968.00. In addition to payment, penalties and interest are now due.

0 Reader Comments
There are no comments for this article. Be the first to comment!

DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.