Sedgwick runs the largest Third-Party Administrator (TPA) of workers’ comp claims in the nation.
This behemoth payer’s frequent incompetence, non-compliance with state laws, and claim mismanagement make workers’ comp needlessly difficult for providers and have labor representatives referring to the so-called “predatory” company as a “menace” to injured workers.
The latest alleged victims of Sedgwick’s failures: 9/11 first responders and survivors.
9/11 Health Watch Executive Director Benjamin Chevat delivered a scathing letter to Sedgwick CEO David North, alleging that the TPA has impeded care for 9/11 first responders and survivors by:
Nothing in Mr. Chevat’s letter comes as a surprise to daisyNews, or to the providers and injured workers across the nation who report being failed, poorly served, or abused by Sedgwick.
In his letter, Mr. Chevat states that he is “not expecting a response” from Sedgwick or its CEO. Similarly, we do not expect Sedgwick to make any statement or take any corrective action. In our experience, Sedgwick shows little interest in changing its operations, which have generated billions in profit for its private equity backers.
Like 9/11 Health Watch and others with limited ability to influence the powerful, we can only watch, report, and call out injustice.
Chevat excoriates Sedgwick, stating that first responders and survivors under Sedgwick’s purview are “facing significant challenges to receive needed care due to [Sedgwick’s] poor performance.”
Chevat lists four specific complaints about Sedgwick’s performance that will ring familiar to our readers (all emphases ours):
daisyNews has documented numerous examples of Sedgwick improperly denying or reducing reimbursement to providers, including through the use of inapplicable or unsubstantiated discount contracts.
We have filed formal Audit Complaints with state authorities regarding how Sedgwick handles bills that it improperly denies, including Sedgwick’s apparent practice of mislabeling formal appeals for correct payment as so-called “duplicates” of the original bills.
Delaying and denying access to care is a seeming selling point for Sedgwick, which openly boasted of delivering clients a “return on investment” by derailing 54% of treating physicians’ requests for injured worker treatment.
Sedgwick removed that statistic from its website following public shaming by daisyNews; however, its current website still promises massive “savings” from its “automatic” treatment decisions.
New York transit workers are no strangers to Sedgwick’s penchant for bungling the paperwork, as evidenced by their reaction when Sedgwick failed to issue thousands of indemnity payments. Reportedly, this followed the Transportation Workers’ Union voicing concerns that Sedgwick lacked the “capacity” to manage workers’ claims effectively.
daisyBill employees know firsthand what it’s like to try to figure out where to access care under Sedgwick, to say nothing of what happens when providers attempt to inquire after payment or treatment requests. To say the least, communication is not Sedgwick’s superpower.
9/11 Health Watch joins daisyNews, labor leaders, and others in publicly calling out Sedgwick. At a recent convention, labor representatives unanimously passed a formal resolution stating that injured workers (emphases ours):
So far, state authorities have shown little inclination to rein in Sedgwick’s abuses. But that does not mean there’s no value in continuing to shine the brightest possible light on Sedgwick’s shortcomings. As Vaclav Havel said:
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.