Three Rivers Provider Network (TRPN) has a deservedly terrible reputation for the duplicitous way in which TRPN ropes providers into its noxious discount reimbursement contract.
Today, we share information on how providers ensnared by TRPN can extricate their practices from the network’s so-called “agreement.”
We also name the claims administrators known to have profited by doing business with this unconscionable network entity. TRPN is not alone in its abuse of providers through this scheme. TRPN is enabled by its customers: claims administrators that apply the TRPN discount to providers’ bills for treating injured workers.
TRPN has been called out by the American Medical Association (AMA), the California Medical Association (CMA), the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), and many more for ugly practices — including sending unsolicited checks (that look very much like payments for medical services) to providers; when the provider deposits the check, TRPN considers the provider to have agreed to the TRPN contract.
Unsurprisingly, providers who find themselves subject to TRPN discounts report never having knowingly consented to the “agreement.”
To avoid this unfortunate fate, providers can take the following steps:
Non-California practices may also use the above language, minus the references to California Labor Code and CMA:
daisyBill cannot guarantee that TRPN will release any particular practice from their “agreement.” However, TRPN has released at least one practice at a representative’s request. TRPN may know the extremely shaky legal ground on which its “agreement” rests and prefer to pick on providers who don’t fight back. Don’t be one of them!
Claims administrators that apply TRPN discounts to providers’ bills are complicit in the network’s schemes.
Below, we name every insurer, self-insured employer, and Third-Party Administrator (TPA) that has applied the TRPN discount to a daisyBill provider’s bill since 2017. We can’t say whether these claims administrators know about TRPN’s methods — but about 90 seconds of Googling reveals the facts.
If these claims administrators weren’t aware before, there’s no excuse now.
Claims Administrators | |
Alaska National Insurance |
Intercare Holdings Insurance Services, Inc. |
Allianz |
Liberty Mutual Insurance |
Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies |
LWP Claims Solutions, Inc. |
Broadspire Services, Inc. |
Markel First Comp Insurance |
Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. |
Matrix Absence Management |
Chubb Group of Insurance Companies |
Midwest Insurance |
Church Mutual Insurance Company |
Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A), Inc. |
City of Santa Monica (CA) |
National Interstate Insurance |
CorVel |
Omaha National Group |
County of Sacramento (CA) |
Pacific Gas & Electric |
Employers Compensation Insurance Company |
PMA Companies |
ESIS, Inc. |
SafeCo Insurance |
Farmers Insurance |
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. |
Gallagher Bassett Services Inc. |
Self-Insured Schools of California (CA) |
Guard Insurance Group |
The Hartford |
Hazelrigg Claims Management Services |
The Walt Disney Company |
Helmsman Management Services LLC |
Tristar Risk Management |
Insurance Company of the West |
Zurich Insurance North America |
Many providers maintain lockboxes to deposit checks and do not personally review every check sent to their practice.
It is easy for TRPN’s Trojan horse of a “participation payment” to make it into a practice’s accounts unnoticed. We cannot allege any specific crime by TRPN — that’s for prosecutors to determine — but even the most underdeveloped sense of ethics can recognize TRPN’s business model for the puddle of dumpster runoff it is.
Claims administrators should not agree to sully themselves by grasping providers’ revenue using TRPN Direct Pay schemes. It’s beneath even the least scrupulous among you.
* Correction, August 17 and 29, October 6 2023: An earlier version of this article contained a factual error regarding TRPN’s ownership that has since been corrected.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.