With attorneys dumping tens of millions of pages of medical records on California Medical-Legal evaluators annually, daisyBill physicians conducted over $93 million worth of record review in 2023.
The Medical-Legal Fee Schedule (MLFS) instructs evaluators to report code MLPRR when the number of pages of records they review exceeds the page limit allowed for the Medical-Legal evaluation. For each page reviewed over the limit, MLPRR pays $3.
We remind readers that physician evaluators are legally bound to review every page of records attested to and sent by attorneys on either side of a Medical-Legal dispute.
In other words, no legislator, regulator, or payer can blame physician evaluators for the record review costs outlined below. These physicians are simply doing their assigned job and should be compensated accordingly.
Free Webinar: Medical-Legal Fee Schedule
4/9/2024 @ 1:00 PM PDT
daisyBill evaluators reviewed over 50 million pages of medical records in 2023, roughly 31 million of which were billable with MLPRR.
As a reminder, the Medical-Legal Fee Schedule instructs evaluators to bill MLPRR for each page of records that exceeds the page count included in the primary evaluation ML Code.
For example, if an attorney sends a QME 300 pages of medical records for a Comprehensive Medical-Legal Evaluation, reimbursement for reviewing 200 pages is included in the payment for ML201. For the remaining 100 pages, the MLFS instructs the evaluator to report MLPRR at a reimbursement rate of $3 per unit.
ML Code |
ML Code Description |
ML Code Payment |
ML Code Record Review Page Limit |
ML200 |
Missed Appointment |
$503.75 |
200 pages Record Review |
ML201 |
Comprehensive Medical-Legal Evaluation |
$2,015 |
200 pages Record Review |
ML202 |
Follow-up Medical-Legal Evaluation |
$1,316.25 |
200 pages Record Review |
ML203 |
Supplemental Medical-Legal Evaluation |
$650 |
50 pages Record Review |
MLPRR |
Record Review |
$3 per page |
When the Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) updated the MLFS in April 2021, the new payment amounts assigned to each primary Medical-Legal Code incorporated the time required for the physician evaluator to:
The DWC agreed that if the parties sent additional medical records beyond the MLFS page limits, the evaluator should be reimbursed for the additional time required for review — hence MLPRR.
In 2023, daisyBill Qualified Medical Evaluators (QMEs) and Agreed Medical Evaluators (AMEs) were sent over 50 million medical record pages for almost 131,000 bills.
In 2023, evaluators billed MLPRR for 31,068,314 pages of record review over the page limits incorporated into the primary evaluation ML Code, with a total amount due for MLPRR of $93,204,942.
CA Med-Legal Payments 2023 |
|
CA Medical-Legal Bills, 2023 Date of Service |
130,981 |
MLPRR: Page Count Billed (exceeding ML Code pages) |
31,068,314 |
MLPRR: Total Amount Due ($3 per page) |
$93,204,942 |
As Medical-Legal expenses climb, payers and their representatives have suggested that evaluators are being paid too much. At a recent DWC Conference in Los Angeles, daisyBill representatives witnessed several references to potential “adjustments” to the MLFS to reduce costs.
It would be a serious injustice to physician evaluators for the DWC to acknowledge (and put a monetary value on) the time and effort required to review medical records only to “adjust” the MLFS after realizing the enormous volume of records the parties send to evaluators to review.
To learn (much) more about MLFS reimbursements and pose your Medical-Legal billing questions to our experts, join us for a free live MLFS webinar on April 9. We’ll cover reimbursements for all the codes and modifiers below, including MLPRR.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.
daisyNews is very good at supporting its opinions with numerical data, so I think it important to point out, there is, on average, only $711.59 of record review per each ML report. Hardly an excessive amount.