On June 2, the California Assembly unanimously passed Assembly Bill 1293, which aims to improve the state’s Medical-Legal process for resolving disputes between injured workers and claims administrators.
If signed into law, AB 1293 would require the California Division of Workers’ Compensation (CA DWC) to (among other things):
The CA DWC would have until January 1, 2027, to institute the changes.
This isn’t the first time California law has tried to increase transparency and oversight in workers' comp. Unfortunately, the CA DWC has a long history of ignoring such legislative efforts.
For years, the CA DWC has blatantly failed to follow existing state laws requiring data collection and publication—particularly regarding Utilization Review (UR)—and has refused to enforce payment laws and regulations in the face of repeated violations by payers.
With the CA DWC in charge of implementing this proposed law, passing AB 1293 is likely to yield absolutely nothing.
California Employers: Ultimately, you pay for the CA DWC’s consistent failure to comply with or enforce the state’s workers' compensation laws. Under the CA DWC, rampant non-compliance means the premiums you pay to ensure your employees’ care are often misused, wasted, or funneled into the bank accounts of private equity firms.
The California Labor Code already requires the CA DWC to collect and publish a vast range of system-critical data. Below are some of the tasks that state law requires the CA DWC to undertake:
Instead, the CA DWC:
In addition to ignoring the law itself, the CA DWC tacitly allows claims administrators to do the same.
The agency routinely fails to enforce payment laws and regulations, appeal procedures, and UR requirements. Laws don’t matter to the lawless—so any law that depends on CA DWC enforcement effectively doesn’t exist.
The results are predictable. Providers flee the system, injured workers struggle to access timely, quality care, and employers continue shoveling premium payments into a barely-regulated system that fails to heal injured employees and return them to work efficiently.
If it becomes law, AB 1293 will:
Theoretically, the above sounds reasonable. Realistically, though, should this be the agency’s priority as it continuously fails to do other, arguably more important work?
Yes, Medical-Legal disputes matter. They’re costly, frictious, and indicative of what makes California workers’ compensation so broken and inefficient. However, many of these disputes could potentially be avoided if the CA DWC adhered to the mandate to make UR more transparent and provided actual regulatory oversight of injured workers’ treatment.
Treatment is the first priority of a healthcare system. Ensuring care requires answers to key questions like:
California employers and other stakeholders don’t have these answers—and the CA DWC inexplicably keeps it that way.
The CA DWC has a well-established pattern—and it bodes ill for AB 1293 and any other legislation California passes.
The CA DWC doesn’t merely struggle with enforcement; it flatly refuses to uphold California law. Even the Legislature’s best attempts at reform will fail if those attempts depend on CA DWC follow-through.
Workers’ Comp Executive reports that the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR)—the agency under which the CA DWC operates—has been in disarray. With Katrina Hagen reportedly exiting as DIR Director, there’s a narrow window for change.
Will Governor Newsom appoint someone willing to make major changes at the CA DWC?
Unless Sacramento gets serious about improving the quality of agency leadership, no amount of legislative good intentions will fix what’s wrong with workers’ comp. Employers and their injured employees deserve better.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.