Data: Duplicate Bill Rates by Claims Administrator

Data: Duplicate Bill Rates by Claims Administrator

Data don’t lie — and the data clearly demonstrate that for workers’ comp providers, sending bills electronically (as e-bills) means sending far fewer duplicate bills (which also means faster payment).

Providers must submit duplicate bills when the claims administrator does not respond to a bill, or reports that the bill is “not on file.”

When a claims administrator timely responds to providers’ bills, there is rarely a need to send duplicates. Therefore, a high rate of duplicate bills indicates that the claims administrator may be needlessly forcing providers to expend excessive time and administrative resources to obtain reimbursement.

Now, daisyBill’s Claims Administrator Directory publishes the rates at which our provider clients must submit duplicate bills to each claims administrator. Read on for details!

Tracking Bills and Duplicates

For workers’ comp bills daisyBill providers sent in the preceding 365 days, the Claims Administrator Directory now lists the following duplicate bill data:

  1. The total duplicate bill percentage for all claims administrators (e.g., 2% of the 2.5 million bills providers sent as of this writing were duplicates)
  2. The percentage of duplicate bills sent to each claims administrator

Duplicate Data: Top Claims Administrator By Bill Volume

Below, we list the 25 claims administrators to which daisyBill providers sent the most bills in the last 365 days. In that time, daisyBill providers sent these claims administrators over 1.9 million e-bills, representing 78% of the 2.5 million bills.

All of the claims administrators listed below accept e-bills from daisyBill. The list is sorted in ascending order according to the percentage of duplicate bills providers had to send the claims administrator.

Note the performance of Next Level Administrators and The Zenith, which both have a 0% duplicate bill rate. Statistically, our providers never have to send duplicate bills to these two claims administrators. Next Level and Zenith are to be commended for making it easier for providers to treat injured workers.

These data demonstrate that when e-bills are correctly delivered to a claims administrator, the duplicate bill percentage and the average days to payment are astoundingly low.

Claims Administrator Name

Provider Count

Injury Count

Bill Count

Bill Delivery

Duplicate Bill %

Avg Days To Pay

Next Level Administrators

1,082

4,759

24,951

e-Bill

0%

9

The Zenith

920

5,252

22,862

e-Bill

0%

8

Gallagher Bassett Services Inc.

2,473

30,585

156,909

e-Bill

1%

5

State Compensation Insurance Fund (CA)

1,995

32,965

151,705

e-Bill

1%

7

Intercare Holdings Insurance Services, Inc.

1,559

21,743

101,602

e-Bill

1%

8

CorVel

2,227

19,659

101,514

e-Bill

1%

7

Liberty Mutual Insurance

1,964

17,112

80,938

e-Bill

1%

6

Travelers

2,113

16,877

76,511

e-Bill

1%

5

AmTrust North America, Inc.

1,946

13,887

69,149

e-Bill

1%

7

Zurich Insurance North America

1,796

12,039

68,673

e-Bill

1%

9

Insurance Company of the West

1,420

11,073

54,434

e-Bill

1%

8

Keenan & Associates

1,102

6,511

32,357

e-Bill

1%

12

Helmsman Management Services LLC

1,227

4,796

22,765

e-Bill

1%

6

Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies

2,629

14,577

71,523

e-Bill

2%

11

Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.

1,981

11,079

54,747

e-Bill

2%

12

The Hartford

1,899

10,274

54,620

e-Bill

2%

6

Athens Administrators

1,602

11,617

54,238

e-Bill

2%

9

Broadspire Services, Inc.

1,777

10,379

54,041

e-Bill

2%

10

Department of Labor

692

3,998

25,333

e-Bill

2%

8

LWP Claims Solutions, Inc.

1,149

4,424

22,998

e-Bill

2%

10

Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.

3,292

110,842

519,690

e-Bill

3%

8

ESIS, Inc.

1,921

14,143

70,530

e-Bill

3%

9

Employers Compensation Insurance Company

1,311

4,569

22,894

e-Bill

4%

5

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority (CA)

428

3,775

22,831

e-Bill

6%

13

Tristar Risk Management

1,341

7,301

32,014

e-Bill

11%

16

Total Bill Count

1,969,829

Unfortunately (but not surprisingly) Tristar has the worst performance on the list, with a whopping 11% duplicate bill percentage and the highest average days to payment at 16 days. By failing to process bills properly, Tristar makes treating injured workers difficult for providers.

Duplicate Data: Non-e-Billing Claims Administrators

Below is a list of the 20 claims administrators that do not accept e-bills, to which daisyBill providers sent the most bills in the last 365 days. daisyBill providers sent over 63,000 bills to these 20 claims administrators via fax or email.

Again the list is sorted in ascending order according to the duplicate bill percentage. To the surprise of no one, these claims administrators have significantly higher duplicate percentages and higher average days to payment than claims administrators that accept e-bills.

The good news: daisyBill sends over 92% of bills electronically as e-bills and only 7% via fax or email. Since most claims administrators compliantly accept and pay providers’ bills most of the time, and daisyBill delivers only clean, compliant bills, duplicate submissions represent only 2% of our providers’ total bills.

In other words, the duplicate percentages and average days to payment below are statistical outliers; we publish them only to demonstrate how inefficient billing becomes when claims administrators fail to accept e-bills.

Claims Administrator Name

Provider Count

Injury Count

Bill Count

Bill Delivery

Duplicate Bill %

Avg Days To Pay

Pitman Farms

13

143

469

Email

0%

18

The Cities Group

51

118

733

Fax

2%

26

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (CA)

122

1,064

2,364

Email

4%

30

Tribal First

129

486

2,076

Email

4%

34

Contract Claims Services Inc.

99

167

823

Fax

4%

18

Pacific Claims Management

388

1,411

7,291

Email

5%

16

JT2 Integrated Resources*

211

468

2,466

Email

5%

13

Homeport Insurance

52

70

518

Email

5%

14

Finish Line Self Insurance Group, Inc

160

263

983

Fax

5%

10

City of Santa Monica (CA)*

99

219

991

Email

7%

21

Packard Claims Administration

311

765

4,199

Fax

7%

19

Risico Claims Management, Inc.

242

875

3,268

Fax

8%

14

PMA Companies

697

1,790

9,010

Fax

9%

14

ClaimQuest, Inc.

191

306

1,610

Email

10%

21

County of San Bernardino (CA)

288

867

4,551

Fax

13%

24

Affirmative

543

2,966

16,575

Email

14%

53

County of Sacramento (CA)

87

300

2,120

Fax

14%

14

Anne Arundel County Risk Management (MD)

5

154

1,589

Fax

32%

28

biBERK

189

203

1,279

Fax

33%

60

Infinity Risk Management Group

98

113

499

Email

35%

61

Total Bill Count

63,414

*JT2 Integrated Resources began accepting e-bills as of 12/1/2023; the City of Santa Monica began accepting e-bills as of 4/1/2024.

Tracking and publicizing duplicate bill submissions is another way daisyBill uses verifiable data to hold claims administrators accountable and offer a useful snapshot of the industry for all stakeholders. daisyBill clients and non-clients alike are free to use the Directory, and to contact our experts via chat (in the pink circle at the bottom right of this page) or email (at info@daisybill.com).


Nationwide, daisyBill increases revenue and decreases hassle for providers who treat injured workers. Get a free demonstration below.

SCHEDULE DEMO

0 Reader Comments
There are no comments for this article. Be the first to comment!
How did you like the article ?

DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.