When a California employee sustains a work-related injury, and the employer maintains a Medical Provider Network (MPN), it is the employer’s legal responsibility to (within one day) arrange and pay for the initial evaluation with an MPN doctor.
California law requires the Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) to provide injured workers a clear and concise explanation of this benefit. According to this law the Workers’ Compensation Claim Form (DWC 1) should provide “easily understandable” instructions to injured workers on managing their work injury.
The law demands this form include “From whom the employee can obtain medical care for the injury.”
However, the DWC 1 provides muddled and imprecise instructions that arguably deprive injured workers of critical information about the employer’s responsibility to immediately provide care for a reported injury.
The information offered by the DWC makes it virtually impossible for employees to navigate an already confusing workers’ comp system — a system made even more unnavigable by MPNs.
Below, we precisely outline a newly injured worker’s rights within the first day of reporting an injury where the employer or insurer maintains a restrictive MPN, and how the DWC fails to communicate those rights to California injured workers.
When an employee reports an injury to an employer that maintains an MPN, the employer must arrange an initial medical evaluation visit with an MPN doctor. According to Labor Code Section 4616.3 (emphasis ours):
California regulations support and expand on these employer responsibilities, mandating that the employer or insurer arrange an initial medical evaluation within one working day with an MPN physician. California Code of Regulations Section 9767.6 states (emphases ours):
This benefit is sensible and simple. Unfortunately, newly injured workers may not be aware of it, due to incomplete and even contradictory instructions the DWC provides injured workers.
Labor Code Section 5401 assigns the DWC Administrative Director (currently George Parisotto) the responsibility of implementing an “easily understandable” claim form that an employee files with their employer to report an injury, and that explains the “potential eligibility for benefits” per California workers’ compensation laws.
To assist injured workers in navigating their injury, the legislature mandated that the Administrative Director include the following information on the claims form the injured employee files with their employer
To adhere to this legal mandate, the Administrative Director developed the DWC 1 form that injured workers must file with their employers to report the injury. Per the legislative requirement, the reverse side of the form includes a “Notice of Potential Eligibility.”
However, Form DWC 1 fails to explain to the injured worker that the employer or insurer is responsible for arranging and paying for the first visit with an MPN physician.
Regarding MPNs, Form DWC 1 states the following:
Astoundingly, the DWC 1 form neglects to instruct the injured worker that the employer or insurer must make arrangements for the injured worker’s initial treatment. Without this essential information, an injured worker cannot know “From whom the employee can obtain medical care for the injury” as required by California law.
It is inarguable that requiring employers to arrange and pay for the first doctor visit (even before the employer has accepted liability for the injury) is theoretically an essential benefit — and immense relief — to an injured worker. Thus the reasoning behind the legislative mandate that the DWC explain this benefit to injured workers.
However, the DWC fails injured workers by not alerting them to this important benefit. Like so many of the unannounced or unenforced requirements designed to help injured workers, the laws and regulations regarding the first visit to an MPN doctor are useless unless they’re executed in the real world.
Anyone who’s been injured at work knows how intimidating and confusing it is to seek prompt, quality care. California law attempts to help injured workers know their legal rights. But rather than comply with the intent of the law, the DWC offers half-baked instructions that fail to help California employees navigate the claims process.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.