It’s time to take a sledgehammer to one of the most pernicious myths about workers’ comp in California. For decades, the Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has fed legislators the same line: workers’ comp is a mess because doctors commit fraud.
According to the DWC, the efforts and resources of legislators should focus primarily on combating physician fraud—because dastardly doctors are sucking up employers’ dollars by exaggerating diagnoses, over-treating, and otherwise draining the system.
A recent comment on one of our blog articles echoed this tired sentiment. We consider this a teachable moment.
California’s workers’ comp system is collapsing under the weight of regulatory mismanagement and the laissez-faire policies of the DWC, which allows profiteering by claims administrators, sidekick vendors, and their private equity owners. Scapegoating doctors—who struggle to make workers’ comp financially sustainable, let alone profitable—will solve nothing.
Read on and marvel at this deeply misinformed commenter trooping out false accusations based on anecdotal evidence (spewed by the DWC) rather than publicly available data.
The original article lamented the absurdly long claim durations in California compared to other states (seven years, compared to three in the median state).
This article demonstrated how this “inefficiency” is simply profitable friction for certain entities, particularly Third-Party Administrators (TPAs), bill review companies, Utilization Review Organizations (UROs), Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs) and other network discount peddlers—and most importantly, private equity firms with investments across these businesses.
We also pointed out (for roughly the 12,000th time) that the DWC does absolutely nothing to address this “inefficiency,” even when faced with hard evidence of patterns of non-compliance by claims administrators like Sedgwick.
Yet one reader felt compelled to defend those who profit from workers’ comp dysfunction by dropping a predictable “whataboutism”: What about providers?
Putting aside the mystery of what we “cannot” do according to this word salad, let’s present the facts about who “stand[s] to profit”:
The idea that providers are raking in profits from the treatment of injured workers is so profoundly misinformed as to be farcical.
It’s far from plausible that doctors in California treat injured workers because it’s a good revenue stream—quite the opposite, as demonstrated by practice closures and/or retreats from workers’ comp. The doctors who are still willing to see injured workers do so despite the financial reality, not because of it.
Meanwhile, there’s little question as to who’s truly profiting in workers’ comp. Business Wire reports on the workers’ comp insurers’ “Winning Streak” as workers’ comp “continues to outperform every other line of business in the U.S. property/casualty (P/C) industry.” Per global credit rating agency AM Best, Business Wire reports that:
In California, private equity firm Carlyle invested $6.7 billion in TPA Sedgwick, which is now valued at $13.2 billion. Carlyle also presides over nebulous webs of bill review entities and network discounting companies, including MedRisk, Medata, Conduent, and more—all siphoning their share of the 49 cents spent to deliver every dollar’s worth of benefits to injured workers.
It’s apparent to any objective observer who is making money from the dysfunction—and it certainly isn’t providers.
Sadly, this entire scheme is enabled by the regulatory body that should be protecting injured workers and their doctors: the DWC. This state agency turns its blind eye to scores of companies leeching billions in profit from the system year after year, openly declaring compliance with laws and regulations “voluntary” for payers while blatantly ignoring laws that require the DWC to take action.
In this fog of lawlessness and opacity, it’s easy to malign and demonize providers, who have relatively little influence over state policy compared to insurers, TPAs, and private equity firms. With legislators and the public thus distracted, the lucrative game goes on.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.
Any medical provider, doctor or otherwise, would know that when you see a workers comp patient, it is not for profit but the amount of red tape bureaucracy, paperwork nightmare, billing headaches due to substantiated and unsubstantiated denials are not worth seeing the patient for. The “accusation” that we are the problem of workers comp and that we are siphoning the profit is ridiculous. A lot of highly skilled doctors and physical therapy places no longer want to take work comp is indicative of this problem. There are a lot of “treat but no pay” situation going on
The workers' compensation reminds me of healthcare rackets in Spain, Italy, and some parts of South America; it's a grifter's paradise.
Physicians have the power to effect change. This type of change requires sincere, aligned collaboration and commitment and it can be done with a leader who can bring providers together to pressure regulators (and payers, network administrators, etc.) to do so. Change is fundamental to progress and there will never be progress without the willingness and commitment (from providers) to change!