Last year, California hit employers with an 8.7% increase in workers' comp premium rates. Meanwhile, almost every other state is cutting rates, in some cases, for more than a decade in a row.
daisyNews has been tracking workers' comp premium changes, and the nationwide picture couldn't be clearer. Medical costs are stable. Workers' comp is one of the most profitable lines of insurance. State after state has looked at the data and passed that success on to employers in the form of rate cuts.
California looked at the same data and did the opposite.
For a mid-sized California employer paying $100,000 annually in workers' comp premiums, the 8.7% hike amounts to $8,700 more per year. Worse, California leadership has offered no sufficient explanation for this extra cost.
daisyNews has reported in detail on workers' comp premium changes for all states in the table below. All but California have lowered premium rates directly or decreased the "loss cost" levels that inform premium rates.
In determining rates, some states take their guidance from the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI). Others use their own independent rating bureaus, like California's Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB). Ohio provides comp coverage directly from the state government, which also determines rates.
State |
Premium/Loss Cost Change |
Effective Date |
Rate Recommendation Body |
+ 8.7% |
9/1/2025 |
WCIRB (Independent) |
|
- 11.5% |
7/1/2025 |
NCCI |
|
- 6.9% |
1/1/2026 |
NCCI |
|
- 13.2% |
10/1/2026 |
NYCIRB (Independent) |
|
|
- 6% (private)* - 1% (public) |
7/1/2025 (private) 1/1/2026 (public) |
BWC (State-run) |
|
- 4.3% |
1/1/2026 |
NJCRIB (Independent) |
|
- 6.7% |
1/1/2026 |
NCCI |
|
|
- 2% (voluntary market) - 1.1% (assigned risk) |
3/1/2026 |
NCCI |
|
|
- 11.6% (voluntary market) - 9.08% (residual market) |
12/1/2025 |
DCRB (Independent) |
*Breaking: Ohio announced an additional 1% cut for private employers effective July 1, 2026.
Averaged across all eight states, employers are seeing rate reductions of roughly 8%, almost the exact mirror image of what California is asking employers to absorb.
The cuts tell a consistent story:
Several of the states above use independent rating bureaus, just like California. New York, New Jersey, Ohio, and Delaware all rely on independent bodies. All reached the same conclusion: cut rates.
California's WCIRB is also independent, but its reporting raises serious questions:
These aren't minor statistical or actuarial quibbles. They go to the heart of how California and the WCIRB justify premium rates, and they deserve scrutiny.
Meanwhile, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners reports healthy loss ratios for California insurers across the board (including for the State Compensation Insurance Fund, the insurer of last resort that doesn’t even attempt to generate profit). California's fee schedules for workers' comp providers are among the lowest in the nation, and PPO contracts drive them lower still.
The national evidence is overwhelming: insurers are profitable and medical costs are manageable. The logical move is to give employers a break. Eight states, using varying rating methodologies, arrived at that same conclusion independently.
California arrived somewhere else entirely, guided by data that insurers supply, and that independent observers have called into question. Until the WCIRB opens its methodology to real scrutiny, California employers have every right to ask why they're among the only ones being asked to pay more.
DaisyBill provides content as an insightful service to its readers and clients. It does not offer legal advice and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose.
As always, nice work on getting this information out.